Literature Review Writing Techniques For Essays

Your Literature Review Doesn’t Have to Be a Yawn

“A literature review?” I thought bedazzled as I came out of my thesis supervisor’s office.

Why would he ask me to write a literature review for a prestigious journal when I hadn’t published any scientific papers yet?

My initial surge of adrenaline wore off as I envisioned myself hunched over my laptop for months writing a literature review.

I had written literature reviews for my courses before, but I was never proud of them.

I always felt like I should have read more articles before turning in my papers.

But writing a literature review was, to put it mildly, boring and overwhelming at the same time.

First, I felt like I was drowning in information.

How could I summarize 50-100 articles into one cohesive paper?

Second, reading literature reviews from others made me want to take a nap.

Literature reviews were stuffed with information as if the authors just wanted to cram as many papers as they could into their bibliography.

So, while I was honored that my thesis supervisor chose me to write a literature review for publication, I wasn’t looking forward to the next 3 months.

I started writing my literature review the same way I wrote all my previous papers.

I alternated between reading and writing until I had about 40 pages of text.

Then, I hit serious writer’s block.

For a whole week I stared at my screen, scrolling up and down without adding any new information.

My literature review draft appeared to be a random collection of ideas.

It had no beginning or end, and I didn’t know how to start editing it.

What was I even writing about, and how did it differ from all the other literature reviews?

Finally, after a week I had an epiphany:

“If I couldn’t read through my own writing, how could I expect others to read it?”

I started wondering how I could make my literature review interesting (what a concept).

I would be more motivated to write it, and my colleagues could read through it without falling asleep.

This slight change in perspective, completely shifted my writing experience.

Instead of cramming in as many references as possible so it would seem “well-researched”, I took a new angle on my topic.

“What would I want to find out from this literature review if I was the reader?”

Instead of just summarizing as many papers as I could, I put an emphasis on recent publications.

I pointed out gaps in our knowledge and cutting edge results emerging in our fields.

During some moments I remembered why I came to grad school in the first place.

I remembered my passion.

I felt like I was putting together a puzzle, and I was driven to find the missing pieces.

I must admit that I was nervous when I hit the send button.

My literature review was different from most others in the field.

I am also not a native English speaker.

So, when my supervisor asked me to see him a few days later, I was prepared to re-write my literature review.

Instead, his eyes lit up when he saw me and said:

“Wow, Dora I didn’t know you could write so well!”

(I didn’t either…It must have helped that I enjoyed the writing process)

This boost in confidence came in handy a year later.

During my first week as a postdoctoral fellow my supervisor asked me to write a book chapter (literature review) on a topic I had little expertise with.

But by then I knew that writing a literature review doesn’t have to be boring.

If you enjoy the process, your readers will thank you too.

5 Steps to Your Best literature Review…

without all the drama

Step #1: Focus on Structure, Then Content, Then Style

If you’re feeling overwhelmed by your literature review, take a deep breath.

You don’t have to cover everything.

You just need to demonstrate your understanding of what’s been published on your topic.

The challenge is to convey all this information to your reader in an interesting way.

Synthesizing all your reading into a well-argued literature review can be daunting, especially if you have perfectionist tendencies (and let’s face it, plenty of grad students do).

You might think that “good writers” can easily form well-structured sentences on the first try.

This couldn’t be further from the truth!

Even the best writers struggle to communicate their ideas, and rely heavily on the revision process to polish their work.

So, how do you tackle a literature review without getting lost?

Imagine that good writing is like building a house: you start with the foundation and the basic structure, before adding all the bells and whistles.

Write your paper the same way: start with the structure, add content, and perfect your form and style at the end.

Make an outline for your review at the very beginning.

It should include your thesis, the general contours of your ideas and research, and what type of reviewyou’ll write.

Then, focus on content.

Don’t worry about how it sounds at this stage; you’re still building your house.

You wouldn’t hang up photos before building walls, would you?

If a statement is clumsy, don’t get stuck, just keep writing.

You can return to it and revise it later.

Remember, a draft is just that: a draft.

Your literature review has to go through several draft stages before you’ve created something you can present.

Don’t worry about style at the very beginning, you can save that for revision.

That’s when you can tinker with your words, and perfect your diction, grammar, and prose.

Step #2: Do Some Writing Every Day

Most grad students are pros when it comes to research.

The tough part is transitioning from reading and researching for your literature review to actually writing it.

How do you know when you’ve researched enough, and it’s time to start writing the review?

The trick is to start writing from the get-go.

Journal a bit in the morning, while you’re having your first cup of coffee.

Write down some goals for the day, and questions for your research.

Take notes when you’re reading, and go over those notes later.

Something you jot down in the early stages of collecting articles might even make it into your final paper.

At the end of a research or reading session, spend 10 or 15 minutes free-writing about how what you’ve read will contribute to your review.

These free-writes can help you to recognize when it’s time to shift your focus from reading more articles, to writing your review.

It’s better to start writing while you’re still in the research stages, than to put it off until you’re “ready.”

Remember, you could keep reading articles forever.

Accept that you can’t possibly cover everything, and aim for a literature review that’s thorough and consistent in its arguments.

Once you’ve written your outline, start writing at any point where your ideas are most crystallized.

A good first draft should always be messy.

Don’t worry about chronological order; you can reorganize your paragraphs and sections during the revision process.

The key is to just get started, and keep your momentum.

Step #3: Define Your Scope

You might start your research thinking you need to read hundreds of articles.

Or, that you need to write a literature review that encompasses every aspect of the literature on your topic.

With that attitude, you’ll drive yourself crazy, and you’ll never get started.

There comes a point where more sources, and more exploration, simply won’t make your literature review more effective.

In particular, you should be focusing your research on primary sources, not other reviews.

A literature review shouldn’t just summarize a big stack of articles.

Your literature review should incorporate what you’ve read into your focused analysis, to show your understanding of the research.

Often, the best reviews aren’t the most ambitious, or the ones with the longest bibliographies.

Instead, a great literature review includes a clear, well-defined scope, and offers some insight into the works it draws from.

One of my first professors once told me that I should read two hundred articles for my first review.

I quickly realized that wasn’t realistic.

If I went too in-depth into too many papers, I’d never be able to make a coherent point.

Instead, I examined a core group of 50 or so articles thoroughly, while touching on others in less depth.

To my surprise, the professor loved it.

Your review should cover a wide range of the articles available.

Include a broad enough range of viewpoints to demonstrate your grasp of the subject matter.

However, don’t include material just for the sake of padding your review.

Make sure your citations are relevant, and that you can tie them into your thesis effectively.

Instead of trying to cover everything,  make sure that what you do include is chosen for a clear reason, and is effectively critiqued.

Step #4: Get a Few Fresh Pairs of Eyes

Every writer—and every grad student—has certain strengths and weaknesses.

To really polish your review, make sure you have a fresh pair of eyes (or a few) to look it over during the writing and revising process.

Your thesis supervisor may be a great resource.

In fact, it’s a great idea to seek advice about a review you’re writing during the meetings with your thesis supervisor.

If you get stuck at a certain point during your writing or research, make detailed notes of what’s holding you back.

The more organized your outline, and the more specific you make your questions, the better your thesis supervisor will be able to help you.

Or ask peers that you trust to read your draft and provide feedback.

Always credit anyone who helps you, and offer your own skills and time to give them feedback in return.

If you find a colleague with different skills and strengths than you have, your work styles can complement each other, and help you both nail your reviews.

Step #5: Add to the Conversation

For one ofmy first literature reviews, I made the mistake of including too much information, without any synthesis.

Luckily, the professor gave me the opportunity to rewrite what I turned in, and I learned some valuable lessons for my next paper.

Your review should show that you’ve thoroughly explored the research that’s already been conducted on your topic.

This will help you to prepare for doing your own research for your thesis.

In other words, your literature review should include critical thinking, not just a summariy of what you’ve read.

Your literature review will be stronger if you can add analysis that ties the sources together, and brings your own insights into your sources.

This could include critiquing the methodology of the previous research.

Or, you can offer predictions, or suggestions, about what future research should focus on.

If you’re making an argument, make sure to include opposing viewpoints, or areas where not enough research has been done to draw a conclusion.

Examining every side of your story will strengthen your literature review and give you more confidence as you move forward with your thesis.

When it comes to writing a literature review what is the #1 challenge that you face?

Please share in the comments below and I will respond to you directly!

What is a literature review?

A literature review is a critical analysis of published sources, or literature, on a particular topic. It is an assessment of the literature and provides a summary, classification, comparison and evaluation. At postgraduate level literature reviews can be incorporated into an article, a research report or thesis. At undergraduate level literature reviews can be a separate stand alone assessment.

The literature review is generally in the format of a standard essay made up of three components: an introduction, a body and a conclusion. It is not a list like an annotated bibliography in which a summary of each source is listed one by one.

Why do we write literature reviews?

At university you may be asked to write a literature review in order to demonstrate your understanding of the literature on a particular topic. You show your understanding by analysing and then synthesising the information to:

  • Determine what has already been written on a topic
  • Provide an overview of key concepts
  • Identify major relationships or patterns
  • Identify strengths and weaknesses
  • Identify any gaps in the research
  • Identify any conflicting evidence
  • Provide a solid background to a research paper’s investigation

How to write a literature review

Determine your purpose

Work out what you need to address in the literature review. What are you being asked to do in your literature review? What are you searching the literature to discover? Check your assignment question and your criteria sheet to know what to focus on.

Do an extensive search of the literature

Find out what has been written on the topic.

What kind of literature?

Select appropriate source material: Use a variety of academic or scholarly sources that are relevant, current and authoritative. An extensive review of relevant material will include — books, journal articles, reports, government documents, conference proceedings and web resources. The Library would be the best place to search for your sources.

How many resources?

The number of sources that you will be required to review will depend on what the literature review is for and how advanced you are in your studies. It could be from five sources at first year undergraduate level to more than fifty for a thesis. Your lecturer will advise you on these details.

Note the bibliographical details of your sources

Keep a note of the publication title, date, authors’ names, page numbers and publishers. These details will save you time later.

Read the literature

  • Critically read each source, look for the arguments presented rather than for facts.
  • Take notes as you read and start to organise your review around themes and ideas.
  • Consider using a table, matrix or concept map to identify how the different sources relate to each other.

Analyse the literature you have found

In order for your writing to reflect strong critical analysis, you need to evaluate the sources. For each source you are reviewing ask yourself these questions:

  • What are the key terms and concepts?
  • How relevant is this article to my specific topic?
  • What are the major relationships, trends and patterns?
  • How has the author structured the arguments?
  • How authoritative and credible is this source?
  • What are the differences and similarities between the sources?
  • Are there any gaps in the literature that require further study?

Write the review

  • Start by writing your thesis statement. This is an important introductory sentence that will tell your reader what the topic is and the overall perspective or argument you will be presenting.
  • Like essays, a literature review must have an introduction, a body and a conclusion.

Structure of a literature review


Your introduction should give an outline of

  • why you are writing a review, and why the topic is important
  • the scope of the review — what aspects of the topic will be discussed
  • the criteria used for your literature selection (e.g.. type of sources used, date range)
  • the organisational pattern of the review.

Body paragraphs

Each body paragraph should deal with a different theme that is relevant to your topic. You will need to synthesise several of your reviewed readings into each paragraph, so that there is a clear connection between the various sources. You will need to critically analyse each source for how they contribute to the themes you are researching.

The body could include paragraphs on:

  • historical background
  • methodologies
  • previous studies on the topic
  • mainstream versus alternative viewpoints
  • principal questions being asked
  • general conclusions that are being drawn.


Your conclusion should give a summary of:

  • the main agreements and disagreements in the literature
  • any gaps or areas for further research
  • your overall perspective on the topic.

Checklist for a literature review

Have I:

  • outlined the purpose and scope?
  • identified appropriate and credible (academic/scholarly) literature?
  • recorded the bibliographical details of the sources?
  • analysed and critiqued your readings?
  • identified gaps in the literature and research?
  • explored methodologies / theories / hypotheses / models?
  • discussed the varying viewpoints?
  • written an introduction, body and conclusion?
  • checked punctuation and spelling?

Further information

0 Replies to “Literature Review Writing Techniques For Essays”

Lascia un Commento

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *